Make your own free website on Tripod.com

Finance 450 at EMU with Dr. Moeller

Super Project Presentation
Home | Meet Your Teacher | Finance 450 | Tire City | Butler Lumber Company | Dell Computer Analysis | Loewen Group Presentation | Super Project Presentation | Marriott Presentation | Radio One Presentation | Eskimo Pie | Cooper Industries | Philip Morris/Kraft | Friendly Cards | Sample Exam Questions

The Super Project

Substantive Issues

The manager of financial analysis at General Foods Corporation questions the suitability of the company’s capital budgeting system in evaluating a proposal to introduce a major new product. The present system ranks projects according to payback period and accounting rate of return. The manager believes that several costs that are omitted from the analysis in the present system should be included in assessing the attractiveness of the proposed investment.

Pedagogical Objectives

This case outlines the capital budgeting system in use at General Foods in 1967 and provides opportunities to:

  1. identify the key assumptions needed to calculate the relevant cash flows from a project;
  2. specify correctly the relevant cash flows utilizing these assumptions;
  3. test the sensitivity of a project’s returns against the assumptions utilized in determining the relevant cash flows;
  4. assess the usefulness of various techniques used to measure the attractiveness of the Super Project.

Suggested Questions

  1. What are the relevant cash flows for General Foods to use in evaluating the Super Project? In particular, show should management deal with issues such as:
  1. test-market expenses
  2. overhead expenses
  3. erosion of Jell-O contribution margin
  4. allocation of charges for the use of excess agglomerator capacity.
  1. How attractive is the investment as measured by various capital budgeting techniques (i.e. accounting rate of return, payback period, internal rate of return, net present value)?
  2. How attractive is the Super Project in strategic and competitive terms?
  3. What potential risks and benefits does General Foods incur by either accepting or rejecting the project?
  4. Should General Foods proceed with the Super Project? Why or why not?